blog:2021-05-30:narrowband_proposal
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:2021-05-30:narrowband_proposal [2021/06/03 18:14] – [What About 2m Simplex?] va7fi | blog:2021-05-30:narrowband_proposal [2024/11/24 12:21] (current) – va7fi | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
There' | There' | ||
- | In Canada, [[references/simplex |FM simplex frequencies]] are channelized in 15 kHz spread for 2m and 25 kHz spread for 70 cm.((Also note that above 147.420 MHz, half of the channels are for analogue and half are for digital.)) | + | In Canada, [[links/simplex |FM simplex frequencies]] are channelized in 15 kHz spread for 2m and 25 kHz spread for 70 cm.((Also note that above 147.420 MHz, half of the channels are for analogue and half are for digital.)) |
< | < | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
It would be a bit annoying to keep two different sets of settings (FM-N with 6.25 kHz VFO spacing for repeaters, and regular FM with 5 kHz VFO spacing for simplex). | It would be a bit annoying to keep two different sets of settings (FM-N with 6.25 kHz VFO spacing for repeaters, and regular FM with 5 kHz VFO spacing for simplex). | ||
- | The big issue with re-channelizing the simplex frequencies is that, the national calling frequency would move to 146.525. | + | The big issue with re-channelizing the simplex frequencies is that, the national calling frequency would move to 146.525. |
+ | |||
+ | In any case, this proposal seems to be moving ahead albeit very slowly. | ||
blog/2021-05-30/narrowband_proposal.1622769249.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/06/03 18:14 by va7fi