Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- blog:2020-08-15:picoaprs [2020/08/15 07:44] – [PicoAPRS] va7fi
+++ blog:2020-08-15:picoaprs [2020/08/15 07:47] – [PicoAPRS] va7fi
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ====== PicoAPRS ======
-{{ :blog:2020-08-15:picoaprs1.png?250}}
+{{ :blog:2020-08-15:picoaprs1.png?200}}
 Described as the "World's smallest APRS Transceiver by DB1NTO", the [[http://www.picoaprs.de/index_en.html |PicoAPRS]] can be used as:
   * a tracker that can send position data
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Here are some screenshots:
-{{: blog:2020-08-15:picoaprs2.png }}
+{{ :blog:2020-08-15:picoaprs2.png }}
 It outputs 1W and you'll need to buy a separate antenna.  The PicoAPRS's antenna port is a female SMA port (so you'll need an antenna with a male SMA connector), so Baofeng antennas won't work.
-[[https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/wmo-picoaprs |DX Engineering]] sells it for $220 and the user comments there are pretty informative.  The gist is that unless you're in an area with lots of digipeater, using this unit with a portable antenna and its meagre 1W won't work as a mobile APRS station.  However, people have used it as trackers for drones or even drone APRS digipeaters
+[[https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/wmo-picoaprs |DX Engineering]] sells it for $220 and the user comments there are pretty informative: it seems that unless you're in an area with lots of digipeaters, using this unit with a portable antenna and its meagre 1W won't work as a mobile APRS station.  However, people have used it as a tracker for drones or even as a drone APRS digipeater.
 It's pretty cool, but I can think of a lot of other things I'd spend $220 before buying this (unless I had a drone I guess).