blog:2021-03-08:cq_dx_2021
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
blog:2021-03-08:cq_dx_2021 [2021/03/08 14:52] – created ve7tbn | blog:2021-03-08:cq_dx_2021 [2021/03/08 17:34] – ve7tbn | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I used this on the recent CQ DX contest as a SOSB on 20 meters. Granted, it was a contest, so LOTS of people were on air but this antenna allowed QSO with Alaska, Hawaii, Japan, Columbia, Brazil, Cayman Islands, Chile, Mexico on an Icom 750 at " | I used this on the recent CQ DX contest as a SOSB on 20 meters. Granted, it was a contest, so LOTS of people were on air but this antenna allowed QSO with Alaska, Hawaii, Japan, Columbia, Brazil, Cayman Islands, Chile, Mexico on an Icom 750 at " | ||
- | SWR were mostly ~ 1.5 or lower with occasional spikes, reflected power was low. I operated | + | SWR were mostly ~ 1.5 or lower with occasional spikes, reflected power was low. I operated |
- | Though I used insulated wire, there might be a risk of someone or animal getting RF burn. But radials were slightly above ground, area was at a dead end with lots of brush around, I had a clear view of vertical and radials while operating. Radials | + | Though I used insulated wire, there might be a risk of someone or animal getting RF burn. But, area was at a dead end with lots of brush around |
Antenna: | Antenna: | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
This is a work in progress and not thoroughly field tested. e.g. not tested in high winds! | This is a work in progress and not thoroughly field tested. e.g. not tested in high winds! | ||
+ | |||
+ | edited for clarity. | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | |||
{{: | {{: |
blog/2021-03-08/cq_dx_2021.txt · Last modified: 2021/03/09 09:01 by ve7tbn