howto:hambasics:sections:wavemodulation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
howto:hambasics:sections:wavemodulation [2020/11/08 14:57] – va7fi | howto:hambasics:sections:wavemodulation [Unknown date] (current) – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Properties of Waves ====== | ||
- | Here we dive a little more deeply into waves and look at three ways that a " | ||
- | |||
- | But first, let's look at the general characteristics of a wave. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Amplitude, Wavelength, Frequency, and Period ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Here's a good introductory video for this section: | ||
- | |||
- | {{ youtube> | ||
- | |||
- | Here are two moving waves. | ||
- | |||
- | {{ggb> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Imagine that the dots moving up and down create the waves that are travelling to the right (as we'll see later, this is kind of like how radio waves are created). | ||
- | - The Blue wave is twice as " | ||
- | - Both waves are travelling to the right at the same speed. | ||
- | - The Blue dot is moving up and down three times as fast as the green dot. | ||
- | - The Blue wave is three times as compressed as the green wave. | ||
- | |||
- | To quantify these observations more precisely, let's look at a snapshot of both waves frozen in time. | ||
- | |||
- | {{ howto: | ||
- | |||
- | * the // | ||
- | * the // | ||
- | |||
- | Now imagine that the animation is in super slow motion and that the waves are actually travelling at the speed of light, which is roughly 300,000,000 metres per second: How many times does each dot go up and down in one second? | ||
- | |||
- | Another way of asking that question is: how many full cycles can you fit in 300,000,000 metres (since radio waves travel 300,000,000 metres each second). | ||
- | * Since the blue wave has a wavelength of 2m, it'll take 150,000,000 cycles to reach 300,000,000 metres. | ||
- | * Similarly, since the green wave has a wavelength of 6m, its frequency is 50 Mhz. | ||
- | |||
- | So a quick way to relate the frequency \$f\$ (in MHz) and the wavelength \$\lambda\$ (in metres) is: | ||
- | |||
- | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
- | \$$ \lambda = \frac{300}{f} \qquad \text{or} \qquad f = \frac{300}{\lambda}\$$ | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
- | Note that the reason we're using just 300, instead of 300,000,000 is that we've cancelled 6 of the zeros so that the frequency is in MHz instead of in Hz. | ||
- | |||
- | Now, here's a related question: how long does it take for each wave to complete one cycle? | ||
- | |||
- | * For the blue wave, we know that it oscillates 150,000,000 times / second, so only one of those time would take 150, | ||
- | * Similarly, the green wave oscillates at 50,000,000 cycles per second, so only one of those cycle would take \$\frac{1}{50, | ||
- | |||
- | The time to complete one full cycle is called the //period (T)// and is the reciprocal of the frequency: | ||
- | |||
- | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
- | \$$T = \frac{1}{f} | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Wave Addition ===== | ||
- | |||
- | When two waves overlap, they add up together at every point. | ||
- | |||
- | {{ggb> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Where do the blue and green waves need to be so that... | ||
- | * the red wave is the biggest? | ||
- | * the red wave is cancelled out?((Fun fact: This is how [[wp> | ||
- | |||
- | If you press the play button on the bottom left corner, you'll see the blue wave travel to the right and the green wave travel to the left. The red wave, which is the sum of the forward and reflected waves, oscillates up and down but doesn' | ||
- | |||
- | While the animation is running, slowly decrease the amplitude of the reflected wave (<fc # | ||
- | |||
- | ====== Modulation ====== | ||
- | Modulation is the process of " | ||
- | |||
- | {{ youtube> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== AM ===== | ||
- | |||
- | AM stands for //Amplitude Modulation// | ||
- | |||
- | For example, let's transmit a single audio note of <fc # | ||
- | {{ am01.png | ||
- | |||
- | Before we // | ||
- | {{ am01b.png | ||
- | |||
- | Finally, we **multiply** the envelope and the carrier, which gives us a wave that has the same frequency as the carrier, but an amplitude that varies like the voice signal: | ||
- | {{ am02.png | ||
- | |||
- | So very roughly: | ||
- | |||
- | **AM Radio Wave** = (<fc # | ||
- | |||
- | <WRAP center round important box 80%> | ||
- | Let's pause for a minute and highlight that here, we are **multiplying** two waves together (not simply adding them). | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
- | The incredible thing about the resulting AM broadcast is that the transmitted radio signal can also be seen as the //sum// of three pure sine waves: | ||
- | |||
- | **AM Radio Wave** = <fc # | ||
- | |||
- | * <fc # | ||
- | * <fc # | ||
- | |||
- | This is absolutely **not** obvious but let's see why it's at least plausible. | ||
- | |||
- | {{ am03.png | ||
- | |||
- | * An <fc # | ||
- | * A <fc # | ||
- | * A <fc # | ||
- | |||
- | Now let's add them together. | ||
- | |||
- | {{ am05.png | ||
- | * at point A, all three waves align so the sum is: 0.5 + 1 + 0.5 = 2 | ||
- | * at point B, the two side bands are opposite and cancel each other and only the carrier remains: 0 + 1 + 0 = 1 | ||
- | * at point C, the carrier is opposite the two side bands so the sum is: -0.5 + 1 - 0.5 = 0 | ||
- | * at point D, the same as point B is happening | ||
- | * at point E, the same as point A is happening | ||
- | |||
- | The result is the same as final AM signal: | ||
- | {{ am06.png | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Note that the carrier has a frequency of 200 kHz just like the original carrier, but the two side bands are 10 kHz lower and higher with half of the amplitude. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== Frequency Spectrum ==== | ||
- | |||
- | An easier way to represent a radio signal is using a // | ||
- | |||
- | For example, the spectrum of our 10 kHz note transmitted over a 200 kHz carrier would look like this: | ||
- | |||
- | {{ am07.png? | ||
- | |||
- | All this is saying is that the radio signal is composed of three pieces: a signal at 190 kHz with an amplitude of 0.5, a signal at 200 kHz with an amplitude of 1, and another at 210 kHz with an amplitude of 0.5. | ||
- | |||
- | There are three things to notice here: | ||
- | * The two side bands are 10 kHz on each side of the carrier (same as the <fc # | ||
- | * Most of the power is going into transmitting the carrier, which in itself doesn' | ||
- | * More fundamentally: | ||
- | |||
- | ===== SSB ===== | ||
- | |||
- | One way of saving power (and reduce bandwidth) is to only transmit one of the side bands. | ||
- | |||
- | ...for LSB, the spectroscope would look like: | ||
- | {{ ssb01.png? | ||
- | |||
- | ...for USB, the spectroscope would look like: | ||
- | {{ ssb02.png? | ||
- | |||
- | By itself, neither of these transmissions would carry the information we need (that the baseband signal was a 10 kHz note) since it's the difference between the sideband and the carrier that gives us that information. | ||
- | |||
- | This is why an AM signal is not too picky about being slightly off frequency (both the sidebands and the carrier are transmitted). | ||
- | |||
- | In reality, the voice we transmit contains a whole group of " | ||
- | |||
- | {{ ssb03.png }} | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | So the AM signal would look like this: | ||
- | |||
- | {{ ssb04.png }} | ||
- | |||
- | Notice how: | ||
- | * the carrier is a single line in the centre because unlike the sidebands, it is a pure sine wave of only //one// frequency. | ||
- | * the two side bands are mirror images of each, which is why it's important that both the receiver be in the same mode as the transmitter. | ||
- | |||
- | And finally, each individual sideband would look like this: | ||
- | |||
- | {{ ssb05.png }} | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | The two main advantages of using SSB (LSB or USB) are that: | ||
- | * It takes less power to transmit the same information. | ||
- | * It takes half the bandwidth. | ||
- | |||
- | Here's a screenshot of VA7FI' | ||
- | {{ scope01.png | ||
- | |||
- | The radio is tuned to 3.880 MHz (where no one is transmitting), | ||
- | * one at 3.875 MHz using LSB, | ||
- | * and another at 3.885 MHz using AM. | ||
- | The scope shows the recent history of the radio signal (called // | ||
- | |||
- | | | ||
- | ^Symmetry |The signal is on the left (low side) of where the carrier would be (at 3.875 MHz) and varies with speech. |The signal has a strong, constant carrier in the centre, and two symmetrical sides that vary with speech. | | ||
- | ^Bandwidth |About 2.7 kHz on the low side of 3.875 MHz |About 6 kHz (2.7 kHz on each side of 3.885 MHz, with two gaps near the carrier) | | ||
- | ^Pauses |During pauses, no radio signal is transmitted. |During pauses, the carrier is still transmitted. | | ||
- | ^Relationship |An AM signal can be understood in LSB mode because it contains the lower side band required. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== FM ===== | ||
- | |||
- | FM stands for //Frequency Modulation// | ||
- | |||
- | For example, let's again transmit a single audio note of <fc # | ||
- | |||
- | {{ fm01.png | ||
- | |||
- | This time, we don't simply multiply the baseband signal to the carrier (as in AM). Instead, we " | ||
- | |||
- | {{ fm02.png | ||
- | |||
- | Here, the math is a bit more involved and requires at least 1< | ||
- | |||
- | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
- | \$$ \cos\Big(2 \pi f_c t + 2 \pi k \int_0^t s(\tau) d\tau\Big) \$$ | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
- | If this looks like Greek to you, don't worry; the math isn't important. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Optional Details ===== | ||
- | For those interested in some of the mathematical details, see this [[wavemodulationmath |optional page]]. | ||
- | |||
- | [[intro|{{/ | ||
howto/hambasics/sections/wavemodulation.1604876227.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/11/08 14:57 by va7fi